County Migration in Texas
- Out of the almost 29-million Texans in 2020, more than 1.55 million (5.3%) residents moved from the county they resided in during the previous year. Although a relatively small percentage, this number of “on-the-move” Texans is greater than the total population of 11 states plus the District of Columbia. More than 70% (1.1 million) of these residents moved to another county in Texas, while 30% (453K) moved out-of-state.
- As you can see from the color legend below the map, net migration for Texas counties ranged from approximately -30,000 to 26,000. The largest net gains were in Denton (25,587), Williamson (18,637), and Tarrant (12,877) counties, while the largest net losses were in El Paso (-7,881), Harris (-18,545), and Dallas (-29,659) counties.
- For the Texans who moved to another county in Texas, more than 45% of those individuals moved to a county that was within 50 miles. This pattern is exemplified in the mobility of people within the DFW Metroplex.
- For example, out of the estimated 81K Texans who relocated to Denton County in 2020, an estimated 41K residents moved from adjacent counties: Dallas (19K), Collin (13K), and Tarrant (8K) counties.
- Out of the 147K residents who left Dallas County in 2020, more than 59K relocated to adjacent counties: Tarrant (21K), Denton (19.4K), and Collin (18.9K).
- Three counties that saw relatively large net losses in migration were in deep south Texas, as Webb, Hidalgo, and Cameron counties combined for a net loss of more than 15K residents who moved within the United States. This highlights one of the challenges when working with ACS data. The data shown on the map do not include international migration data that are included in the ACS migration flows data. This is due, in part, to the ACS data only showing “in-migration” estimates aggregated at the continent level for non-residents of the United States. Because these data do not show bi-directional flow (out-migration to other countries), migration into certain Texas counties (e.g., on the Mexico border) can artificially inflate net migration rates, as the ACS data do not account for how many individuals are estimated to have moved from a Texas county to another country.
- Almost 85% of all Texans lived in the same residence in 2020 as they did in 2019.
- Out of the 15% who moved, around 9% moved to a different residence in the same county.
- For counties with populations greater than 15,000, the highest percentage of within-county relocation occurred in Brazos (15.2%), Lubbock (13.5%), Nacogdoches (12.7%) and Bell (12.6%) counties.
- Four counties that have populations greater than 15,000 experienced double-digit in-migration from other Texas counties: Jones (19.5%), Rusk (11.4%), Liberty (11.3%), and Fannin (10.6%).
So What?
The data and observations shown above provide but a glimpse into the complexity and multifaceted nature of the geographic mobility data published by the US Census Bureau. Even with issues surrounding estimation techniques, such as unidirectional international migration along the US-Mexico border, these robust data can be incorporated into localized planning processes at the regional, county, and institutional levels. In the next few blog posts, we will explore how entities might use these data elements to inform decision-making processes moving forward.
Similar Posts
Faculty and Student Demographics: A Comparison at Texas Public Universities
A comparison of faculty and student demographics at Texas public universities Success of students in higher education can be attributed to many factors. Personal work ethic, academic preparation, effective learning environment, and support systems are just a few of the variables that promote student persistence and graduation from colleges and universities. Among higher education researchers,…
IHE Enrollment Trends in Texas: Demographic Data
IHE Enrollment Trends in Texas: Demographic Data The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) recently published more granular enrollment data for all public universities in Texas, providing the first insight into how COVID-19 affected student enrollment across demographic groups. In the previous blog post, we showed that statewide enrollment at public universities increased from 657,985 in…
Persistence and Retention: The National Perspective
Persistence and Retention: The National Perspective While the past few blog posts have specifically addressed enrollment trends in Texas public universities, this blog post will begin a multi-part series of posts that will look at student outcomes data. We will begin by looking at the national trends associated with persistence and retention before moving to…
Does student-faculty similarity improve graduation outcomes?
Does student-faculty similarity improve graduation outcomes? As has been the case with past data blogs, many of the conversations occurring in higher education are focused on the concepts associated with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Universities, systems, and state boards of higher education are grappling with the implications of DEI, especially in terms of identifying…
Examining student-faculty similarities and graduation outcomes for African American students
Student-faculty similarity and graduation outcomes for African American students In our previous blog post, we introduced the concept of using location quotient (LQ) scores, which serve as a measure of demographic similarity of faculty to students, as a predictor of six-year graduation rates within race/ethnicity groups. In general, we saw that a higher representation of Black…
Examining student-faculty similarities and graduation outcomes for Hispanic/Latinx students
Student-faculty similarity and graduation outcomes for Hispanic/Latinx students In our previous blog post, we examined the relationship between the demographic similarity of faculty to students on campus and six-year graduation rates for Black or African American students. Across Doctoral Universities and Master’s Universities, there is a positive association, as a higher representation of Black or African…